POST LCROSS THOUGHTS

Commentary #41

October 11, 2009

 

My work and the conclusions on it I present are guided by the visual evidence that I've discovered and that others have discovered. Some might say that what I call "evidence" is merely graphics tricks, ignorance, imaging artifacts not adequately taken into consideration, or some combination thereof. If they so desire, it is their right to come to such conclusions and I acknowledge it even though I don't applaud it. However, it is also my right in a free society to proceed with presenting real visual evidence and voicing my opinion on it, especially since most of the discoveries are my own.

For me, the simple bottom line is that the Clementine Moon imaging evidence indicates that someone with technology significantly more advanced than our own is on the Moon and active there. Likewise, the sheer degree of image tampering applications in the Navy Clementine imaging data attempting to hide this is itself also evidence that I cannot ignore even if others can. Then add to that the tipping illogic of our not returning to the Moon all these decades since the 1960s for no apparent sound reason.

Whether or not the general scientific community or the mainstream public accepts any of this evidence or not is a matter of belief system consensus psychology having little to do with the evidence itself. It is their right and I acknowledge that as well. However, I have little to no respect for such problematic human behavior psychology and so it is irrelevant to my conclusions or reporting because I am confident that many of you will find merit in at least some of what I report on. Each of us must live with our own conclusions and any consequences generated. Posterity will eventually determine conclusively what is the right and wrong of these things and I'm satisfied with that.

As for the LCROSS mission on the Moon, some of you may not like some of what I have to say about it. The fact is that I didn't even watch the publicized LCROSS event at the time and slept through it by choice. Why would I want to? It went just as I expected it to with no real public content and conveying only its design tactical. In my opinion, the apparent unreasoning aspect of the event was in part a tactical to profile world wide human behavior and how effective their media manipulations would be on that behavior with respect to this event.

For example, if the world population or in any well populated industrialized country had gotten very upset coming out against it despite the media carrying it as a good event to become enthusiastic about, that profile would dictate more caution and/or manipulation in future scenarios. As it was, the media portrayal was very effective in leading clueless populations by the nose subduing public concern and we can expect that profile to prevail in their thinking in any future scenarios.

Remember to that, if anyone else is out there paying attention to what we're doing, you can bet they paid close attention to this event and it served their purposes as well and is likely why it was allowed to continue. Not all of us individually but, as a world full of 6.7+ billion people, we just dropped the ball miserably. They now know that we in general don't care sufficiently about what happens to anyone else but ourselves and it is no accident where the recent greed exhibited in the world's international financial affairs came from at its roots.

If there is anyone out there with any benevolent disposition toward Earth humanity, it would not be hard to see them as now regarding us as morally and ethically bankrupt and not worth the trouble to help. After all, you are what you actually do or don't do, not what you say you intend to do or meant to do. Only deeds count, not expressed intent. What we allow is the same thing as our actively doing it. Trying to weave something into existence via rhetoric is just illusion for our own consumption having nothing to do with reality and I might add that reality could care less.

Further, if we are being manipulated and there is someone else watching, it tells anyone else how much under control and how clueless we really are as a world population and how much power over world populations the manipulators do actually have. Note that this obviously serves the purpose of the manipulators and may even have been the primary goal of the LCROSS concept as a demonstration of power and the physical bombing was just a tactical diversion non issue.

For example, if you were any of the thought to be benevolent races thinking about landing a small multiracial fleet at the summer olympic games right in front of all those Earth multinational cameras in an appeal directly to populations and the secrecy agenda knew it, what do you think the secrecy agenda's reaction would be? They certainly couldn't physically stop it but they might cause the "aliens" to rethink doing it. First you show them how much power you have over the clueless populations and then you threaten to declare the landing an alien attack and treat it as such. Anyone would have to take that threat seriously.

Yes in such a scenario there would be many casualties but most of that would be to expendable (from the manipulator's point of view) civilians and a few political leaders. If done right, they and their countries could easily be convinced that the alien menace did it and Earth would become an armed camp against all aliens and even more thoroughly under the sway of the manipulators. In other words, the alien landing would accomplish the exact opposite of its intent. See how complicated such scenarios can be.

After 9+ years of doing this and fending off powerful adversaries, yes I'm cautious and a bit cynical and it may show some in this type of narrative. However, this is not the way I think fundamentally but make no mistake, it is the way Earth humans thoroughly addicted to power think. They and their way is the problem. They are at the top of a pyramidal power structure and do not wish to relinquish any of it, They see space exploration and a greater environment as an opportunity to grab yet more power.

Yes I suspect that something entirely different than publicly promoted was and is going on with the LCROSS concept. I suspect it has to do with aliens but I do not claim to know what it truly is. However I do strongly suspect that what ever the truth is on that score, potential risk and consequences to our world but yet unknown to us is a part of it. Someone made that decision for all of us without our knowledge or input and I find that disturbing and you should as well.

Further, I suspect that the President's Noble Peace Prize award without warning was a preplanned distraction designed and timed to distract away from the risk aspect should a gone bad scenario unfold from the LCROSS event. It stuck out like a sore thumb because the risk aspect likely didn't unfold, at least not yet. That means they didn't have to involve jacking up the controversy troops following the announcement if it was needed and so that too was left to lay as a tactical dud without promotion.

I also suspect that the true secret bombing aspect did not go off as planned but hopefully neither did it go very bad risk wise either. It likely turned out to be a more-or-less non event all the way around with few if any consequences for anyone. It was the same with that asteroid some time ago that might come close enough to hit Mars that many were hoping would happen but didn't. If so, I suspect that such a more favorable outcome on the Moon is of someone else's doing and not our own and that is both the good and the bad of it.

No doubt the post LCROSS public face presented will pretend that everything went off well as planned with data to back it up and its back to business as usual. We came, we saw, we conquered, we're bad, great work team! The illusion is preserved. The truth is that our space exploration has as much or more to do with Earth human psychology all up and down the levels and with manipulative power as it does with what ever is really out there.