CURISOITY MHLI ANOMALIES-3

Report 237

September 1, 2014

Updated 9/10/2014

At last we have something that may actually be native to Mars. As many of you have no doubt surmised, I have reservations about the latest mission to Mars and what may or may not be revealed in that I don't believe much truth will be forthcoming. So why do I say this may be legitimate?

For one thing, to the best of my knowledge, the anomalous evidence I'm reporting on here is almost certainly not native to Earth unless someone at official level just wanted to visually put something completely strange and false up for us in order to motivate us and generate debate. As you know, from the secrecy point of view, debate=interest=money without strings attached as long as the truth doesn't go too far.

Another point is that the evidence here has a lot of visual distortion on it that someone doing this may have thought was adequate to obscure identification. If so, it is almost successful in that regard but in the end didn't quite get the job done.

Also many of the source MHLI collection of images are presented flipped upside down not just this one and, when the default minimized non expanded version of the official image is initially displayed, the key anomalous evidence in this image is presented out of sight in the upper right corner of the image meaning that a second look by anyone doing this could have in a hurry actually over looked it so it would have gotten away without perceiving the need of any further obscuring treatment.

Finally, there is only one official image with this evidence in it. This leads one to suspect that someone was aware that the first one presented a problem from the obfuscation point of view that would require some "special treatment" and aborted any more images of it. This of course would eliminate the need for subsequent special treatment. Of course this is speculation but, in my experience, it fits the psychological profile of many really in charge of these Mars missions.

For the sake of convenience I'm going to name this anomalous object revealed here as the "Mars Gale Sand Monster" likened to the tradition of the "Gila Monster" lizard well known here in Earth's dry places of North America. The Curiosity Mars visual imaging evidence is as follows.

http://mars.jpl.nasa.gov/msl/multimedia/raw/?s=630&camera=MAHLI

When one is initially opening up the official image, the above compressed image is what one sees except slightly larger. Note that I have reduced the total size of the image so that all of the evidence and its context scene will display as above. Note especially the part of the Mars sky in the lower right corner clearly demonstrating that the official image has been flipped and is upside down. Note that someone is obviously doing this at official level and that it is not me. Worse, this flipping is typical of the official Curiosity MAHLI imaging collection as presented for public consumption.

Note that what I believe to be anomalous evidence is pointed out by my white arrow and label in the upper right portion of the first image here. When I first saw this fuzzy object in the official provided view, I confess to thinking that it might be a manufactured keyboard control panel of some kind because of the regular organized size and placement of the keypads within a dark color boundary. However, closer inspection soon led me on a different interpretation path as discussed here.

http://mars.jpl.nasa.gov/msl/multimedia/raw/?s=630&camera=MAHLI

The above second image provides a closer regular 100% view of the primary anomaly object while eliminating part of the context scene. If one ignores the other anomalous objects nearby the main one with the dark border, you can perhaps appreciate how one might initially come to think the central object might be a manufactured object partially buried in the sand with strangely shaped but with an organized keypad layout on it.

However, the fact is that there are multiple anomalous less obvious objects also here in this image with similar appearances also beginning to be revealed at this resolution. Although some are without the dark borders of the primary object, they demonstrate the same rows of very organized raised uniform size tiles that I originally mistook for keypads. In fact the largest one with the dark border appears so very long in length that it might give one pause to reconsider just what it may be.

I can tell you that so far I've not found anything else in the MAHLI camera collection that looks like this anomalous material or shares its very pronounced and organized surface tiles layout. Therefore, it is unlikely to represent any kind of Mars natural geologic material plenty of which you can see in other images as well as here in this surrounding terrain.

The above third image provides a 200% enlarged view. At this amount of zoom I'm beginning to suspect that we may be looking at life rather than mechanical inanimate objects in the Mars' Gale Crater sand. I'm thinking that the larger object with the dark border may be a wider bodied female Mars sand serpent of some kind leading and/or being accompanied by slightly smaller male sand serpents characterized by their not displaying dark borders and blending in more with their immediate surroundings.

Note that the larger creature with the dark border back along its length has a few dark objects projecting from its rear top surface. I suspect that these projections represent the rear end of its body and the more slender similar object to the rear of that may be another sand serpent that the large female has given birth to or perhaps it may be an offspring latched onto her perhaps even another lesser sand serpent pressing her for copulation.

At the point of reading my admittedly subjective leaning comments above, the trolls who often dog this work never having a positive opinion about what I say will no doubt go through the appearance of becoming convinced that I've lost my mind and tumbled over the edge and no longer able to separate fiction from reality. No doubt the trolls will be all over this like white on rice putting on a show but, in fact some fence straddlers may also come to the same conclusion.

The trolls I could care less about what they think but I will admittedly regret to some extent if I've convinced some innocents straddling fences including perhaps some scientists following this work that I am after all not objective in my assessments. You see, I do see myself as quite objective and not wild or irresponsible. The reason that I have a little trouble keeping quite about what I see now is that I anticipate some of Earth being willing to send manned future missions to Mars secretly carrying pathogens to spread extinction while the manned human personnel remain ignorant and also unprepared for the realty of what they will be facing on or around Mars.

Don't think any humans here on Earth would have the nerve to do such a thing? Look back through history. Hitler, Stalin, Genghis Khan, etc. killed many millions just for convenience and yet they all had a large social structure that backed them in it and were not alone. Here in our time someone in power is taking and spending vast sums of our money on space research and yet keeping us in ignorance about most of what has been learned which amounts to treating us much as cattle. The sleeper must awaken.

The fact is that this may have already happened but hopefully has been intercepted and neutralized by those on Mars. If so, I can only applaud their extraordinary restraint in dealing with the more grasping, foolish, and brash of this world. Remember, we humans are not all cut from the same cloth. Some of us actually have active and functioning value systems in place.

The above 3rd through 6th images provide closer and closer views of the anomalous evidence. Except for the 6th image blown up 400% the evidence holds up fairly well in these closer views. At least well enough to warrant a more detailed Curiosity rover examination. However, that closer scrutiny doesn't appear to have happened unless they are withholding images and is that why only one actually appears in the record?

ATTENTION: You who are training for the future manned mission to Mars, be prepared not just to face dry sand and rock that we've all been seeing but also intelligent occupants of this world capable of and possessing a willingness to conduct global war and also predatory creatures unique to this world. Do not allow yourself to be misled and surprised. No one is expendable and don't let criminality be your primary legacy to the future.

9/10/2014 ADDENDUM: I'm getting some feedback that my analysis is wrong on this evidence and that once the image is flipped to an upright position the anomaly really appears to be the Curiosity rover wheel tracks rather than something living and that it is fairly obvious. If this kind of feedback was coming from trolls who often dog work like this, I would not pay much attention to it since they usually criticize regardless of how on the mark or not my analysis may be.

However, this particular criticism is both polite and constructive coming from loyal viewers who have long followed this work and I give their feedback far too much respect to ignore it. Further, this type of evidence is not by any means obvious and has a lot of subjectiveness to it leaving room for someone, including me, to be wrong. So the following additional images will present the rover track side of this issue providing some balance and viewers as usual should make up their own minds.

http://mars.jpl.nasa.gov/msl/multimedia/raw/?s=630&camera=MAHLI

The above 7th image is merely the 3rd image in this report flipped by me both vertically and horizontally. This action returns it to the correct upright position from the flipped position the official image occupies as evidenced by the 1st image in this report. Criticism indicates that this makes the evidence look more like rover tracks. In my opinion this remains debatable but you must decide for yourself.

Also, I must admit that what I have called tiles does show a sort of zig-zag pattern on the right end of the object in the above 7th image. If I were to judge the evidence based on that alone, I also would suspect rover tracks. However, the majority of the rest of the "tiles" seem to show a more squared grid pattern rather than the rover wheel zig-zag patternm and that brings me back to my original reporting. So I just can't throw the baby out with the bath water here as the saying goes.

 

http://mars.nasa.gov/msl/images/Scarecrow-rover-test-wheel-close-up-dumont-dunes-full.jpg

The above 8th image shows a nice look at a sample of the Curiosity rover's wheels. Note the widely spaced shallow zig-zag metal treads and pattern. This image is made here on Earth rather than on Mars but it gives the viewer some idea as to what to logically expect from rover tracks that may be laid down in Mars dry sand.

http://mars.nasa.gov/msl/images/mars-msl-hidden-valley-tracks-Sol-709-Ncam-PIA18590-full.jpg

The above 9th image is of the Curiosity rover tracks in loose soil (sand) supposely on Mars at the "Hidden Valley" site. Note that, although the loose material doesn't hold tread patterns well, the wheel's shallow zig-zag pattern is still discernable. If the evidence that I reported on had demonstrated this kind of look, I also would have leaned in favor it being rover wheel tracks and left it alone as something not anomalous.

Truthfully, if one examines this report's 3rd, 4th, 5th and 7th images very closely, one is hard pressed to find the zig-zag pattern but it is there and, when one does find it, it does not extend over the entire evidence. Further, as you see in the above 10th image, the rover wheels appear to have a tendency to plow up the ground leaving only universally turned up underlying dark soil in its track. This is quite a bit different than the reported on evidence where light colors separated into a similar raised tiles look tends to dominate either the evidence upper side and/or its center areas.

In the above 7th image, note the small darker area about midway down the evidence tiles. This is likely a repeated pattern of collapsing soil tread seen in the rover tread pattern on the right in the above 9th image. If so, this would be evidence that what I call life is nothing more than poorly seen rover tracks.

Now some incongruities can of course be explained by soil, weather, camera angles, etc., natural factors. That's enough I suppose for some people to be conclusive about this being rover tracks but not enough for others and I still fit in the latter group. Even so, I am backed up a bit and cannot be dismissive of the other opinions either.

, Investigator