Mars Anomaly Home Page Comments Page Book Evidence Page Report Listings Main Directory Page

CURiOSITY & TRUTH?

Report #227

May 10, 2013

 

http://photojournal.jpl.nasa.gov/catalog/PIA16204

Believe it or not, in the above image shown just a presented by NASA and with no graphics work in it by me, there is very strong anomalous life evidence of mammal life. The question is it of life on Mars similar to that here on Earth encountered by the Curiosity rover on Mars Sol 52 or, alternatively, is it proof that someone has been messing around with the imaging and managed to miss something very important, something revealing what is really going on with the Curiosity imaging.

What I want you to do is find the anomalous evidence for yourself in the above first image. Do it without cheating (by looking at other images below) and in the process demonstrate to yourself just how difficult the evidence is to detect even with clues, when in plain sight, and therefore just how easy it would be for even image graphics specialists in trying to manipulate the image content to miss something like this and then later get caught up by it.

This image evidence was brought to my attention by viewer Monte Williams months ago 1n 2012 via email during a time just before my recent injury. In fact it was during a time when I was just too overwhelmed with work to pay enough attention to every thing and so I rejected it initially after the briefest of looks. Fortunately, rather than being offended as he had a right to be, Monte quitely persisted. His polite but insistent approach persuading me to look again more carefully and this time the evidence immediately leaped out at me I'm happy to say and now here I am sharing it with you.

The truth is that I just wasn't expecting anything in the Curosity imaging to be so clear and obvious and this likely effected my initial judgement or lack of it. Often, even with researchers like me that try to keep an open mind, what one is able to see is initially often affected by one's expectations. When one doesn't expect much, one is frequently not disappointed.

Understandably impatient in fooling around with mental foot draggers like me, he presented it himself and persuaded a few other websites to also present it, so you may have already seen this elsewhere. Even so, it's still worth looking at again just as I did. It's just too important in its implications to forget.

After all, if it is as it so oviously appears to be, it is either proof of common every day Earth type life on Mars or proof that someone substituted Earth terrain in this graphics image and just slipped up by not noticing two Earth mammals (clue) taking a rest in it blending in with the rocks. Remember, your tax dollars paid for this. It is your property and it is for you to decide whether this evidence is important or not and not a bunch of scientist wowed into a compliant psychology by NASA and JPL and the opportunity to work on this and future high profile space programs.

http://photojournal.jpl.nasa.gov/catalog/PIA16204

The above 2nd image shows the location of the evidence in question pointed out by my yellow arrows and within the yellow outline box. The yellow arrow on the right also points out what at first looks very much like a huge prehistoric Earth megladon shark fossil tooth. However, closer inspection reveals that this is more likely to be just a rock that happens to take this particular shape.

That's the way of many items that at first look like good evidence but upon closer inspection begin to loose the look that brought on the increased attention. In any case, take note of what looks to be a rodent of some kind within the yellow box outline on the left. Further, it looks more and more like that type of evidence of life the closer one examines it. Note the following image with the Mars Curosity evidence on the left and Earth evidence for comparison on the right.

http://photojournal.jpl.nasa.gov/catalog/PIA16204
http://www.tumblr.com/tagged/giant-hamster

http://www.allcampgrounds.com/blog/?p=446

As you can see in the above 3rd split screen image, zooming in on the rodent at 200% and 250% in a .tif image not only increases its look as a living organic life form, it also reveals that the main creature evidence with the tell tale eye may not be alone. On the main evidence object note the dark open eye and the lighter color hairs immediately over and around the eye subtly framing it and forming an eye brow, then note the same surrounding eye detail and the same fur color features on the Earth Capybara I've included for comparison in the upper right split screen of this third image. This evidence may be cute and cuddly looking but it it also heady powerful stuff!

The lower left Curiosity 250% zoom image reveals that the main evidence object does in fact appear to be a rodent like creature covered in light shaded fur. Note that I've also included the similar image of the Earth Prairie Dog family in the lower right split screen. Unfortunately, although the general size and body build of the Praire Dogs as you can see is comparable, it appears that this image was taken here on Earth using a color filter that artificially rendered the creatures and their environment with a similar universal tan color or someone did this in processing the image.

Now go back to the 250% main evidence image on the lower left. In it note that there is a white rock just partially visible in the background close on the opposite side of the main creature with the view partially blocked by it and as seen just over its back and rear. Also, via identification of proximity and fur shading, it appears that there may be a second animal of the same type with its back and left side exposed to us laying there in a curved shape and with its rear legs in a hole or depression. This second creature's fur clad body is blocking the view of the right rear quarter of the main animal. No head or legs of the second creature are visible but the fur clad shape of it and swelling at the appropriate places with its rear basically toward us suggests that these features would be present and that this is in fact a companion animal.

I think that at least the main visual evidence is so strong as to warrant our assumption that what we are looking at is at least one living mammal rodent like creature with an open eye here in this imaging. If we can accept that this is a fur clad rodent, the question then becomes whether this evidence is really on another distant world like Mars or something from Earth manipulated into the Curiosity imaging and missed by those who would do such manipulation? Now you begin to see why I demonstrated how it isn't easy to see this evidence and how easy it is to miss even with hints one as to its presence.

What is easier to do is fool people who just can't bring themselves to really suspect and thereby question the presence of manipulation starting with some of the legitimate Curiosity team scientists. Planning and getting the Curiosity rover to Mars, landing it safely, exploring the Mars surface, and analyzing the results is a very large and complicated task to undertake. To be efficient such tasking requires specializing and compartmentalization and a great deal of commitment. The scientists and engineers in the teams deserve a lot of credit for a job well done and my hat, if I had one, is off to them in this regard. This solid accomplishment is something that we all need to not overlook and acknowledge.

However, larger compartmentalized projects that benefit so much from specialization are also projects within which much can be hidden within the increased complexity and particularly where so many instruments are involved and where everyone accepts what they've been told at official upper levels. For example, a data package of images from 17 cameras can be broadcast to Earth and received in secret by Artificial Intelligence (AI) programs under secret encryption and, if the programming is up to it, processed quickly by the AI's working much faster than humans to be sent back and rebroadcast to Earth with the correct encryption expected by the participating scientists. The latter having no reason to be suspicious or to question (from their point of view) simply would not be any the wiser thinking they were receiving original raw data that would then go to their own people for processing.

It's a case of secrets within secrets. The first surface level of secrets are of course those kept for National Security reasons from known adversaries and those hoping to profit from industrial espionage, etc. I think most of us can understand and accept this necessity. A routine example would be the obscuring smudge that is always routinely mapped to the individual solar cells hiding their labeling since day one on all the rovers sent to Mars. This eliminates the labels on the no doubt enhanced solar cells and in theory inhibits their identify from being known and replicated by others.

It always amazes me that so many people that shouldn't be are surprised to have their perception stuck in this and especially to the obvious concept that this kind of very precise mapping and obfuscation applications by AI's can target other scenes in an image both on a rover and in its surrounding terrain. In the various wars in the Mid-East where vehicles traveling at speed down battleground roadways routinely have the road shoulders closest to the vehicles smudged out in theory to prevent accidental views by the public of the roadside carnage that could slip through.

However, then the secrecy can also drill down into many more levels far below that required by necessity. In other words, the real anomalous information as to what ever is on Mars (or elsewhere) that is worthy of secrecy by someone's definition resides with the AI's who never talk or reveal anything unless it is to those select few that have command structure access to them. In other words, if you are a legitimate scientist on the MSL Curiosity team, you could be resting your morning cup of coffee unknowingly on top of a massive anomalous covered up data dump and never even know it.

It is also not my intention here to take away from a discovery of animal life on Mars and that to may be what this is. On the other hand and as I have been warning in my reporting, I've anticipated that the image tampering technology will have brought the secrecy types to the point that they could feel bold enough to use it to full extent in the Curiosity imaging. That would take many forms including the substitution of whole sections of Earth terrain into the Mars imaging. The advantage to secrecy types is that true Mars terrain is eliminated by this slight of hand and thereby the risk of missing something on Mars too revealing in it. After all with thousands of objects in a single Mars image, it is still all too easy for it to happen.

On the other hand, it is just as easy to miss something in the Earth substitution imaging and then have to do the impossible and explain it likely as something the public may regard as acceptable. That's the question here. Is the evidence animal life we are looking at here in this imaging a substituion from Earth's terrain missed by the secrecy types and not something real on Mars or is it truly something real on Mars? If past performance is an indicastor, during the last 12-13 years of my investigative reporting, much of the evidence I've presented has so often shown:

(1) That consistent determined secrecy is deeply embedded in and running space exploration.

(2) There is no hesitancy to use it to promote ignorance. Indeed, it seems to have become the norm.

(3) That Mars does have surface water in a liquid state as well as vegetation life taking advantage of it.

(4) That Mars with surface water and bio-life logically would have more advanced forms of life as well.


It also seems fairly obvious that the secrecy types are simply unable to bring themselves to spill the beans on themselves and take their lumps while they can perhaps still afford to. The best they can seem to do is flirt around with the most minimal revelations that water and life could have existed on Mars in the ancient past even though so many have moved on past that point as a given and it is simply no longer enough to save them. Continuing to keep the mainstream in ignorance is a delaying tactic that has just about completely worn out its effectiveness and welcome with so many.

One day and probably soon secrecy will collapse and the truth will explode too suddenly into mainstream awareness. The shock of it for those in the mainstream unprepared will result in the extremes of denial, disillusionment, the fleeing of trust, the anger, the retribution, and an end to protective isolationism as others take the power from you. No aliens are going to provide you with an excuse to divert attention away from yourself and, face it, any others aren't going to let you manufacture any false flag scenarios to that end trying to shift the blame away from yourself to others.

This is after all the bed of your making and you are going to have to lay in it. Time has about run out. Change is nearly upon us. Either lead while you can, take your lumps, and preserve what you can, or loose all and go the way of the dinosaur and buggy whip.

In any case, here you have these rodents as hard visual evidence. They either represent life on Mars or here on Earth with each possibility having its obvious implications. My thoughts are that, since NASA and JPL appear to be ignoring these rodents and not claiming them as life on Mars, then image manipulation is the most likely explanation and they just hope it will go away in the mainstream's mind again and that their stonewalling will continue to be successful.

, Investigator

 


Moon Evidence Directory Tampering Evidence Directory Warefare Evidence Directory Strange Evidence Directory Civilization Evidence Directory Biological Evidence Directory Water Evidence Directory