MARS BIO-LIFE SAMPLES
Report #200
April 15, 2011
I suspect many of us are getting
frustrated and tired of the mainstream media and population ignoring and pretending
that Mars surface water in a liquid state evidence and substantial biological
life in the form of vast forests doesn't exist even though it can be easily
verified right in the official science data. For the objective independent
analytical type, with the combination of the website and book bio-life evidence,
there is actually more than enough such evidence presented to intrude into
consciousness and change minds. However, the problem isn't with the evidence,
rather it is with the mainstream psychology and their great numbers.
The average person, busy with their private lives and not knowledgeable at
all on this subject, have been conditioned to accept and believe a certain
way by a parade of consensus so called science experts trotted out over the
decades and generations to repeat the same old party line. At the same time
and even worse, the average person has also been conditioned to be led and
it must be by those they've chosen by consensus default to regard as their
leaders on such matters. Any other source, regardless of the quality of the
hard evidence presented or how obvious is may be, especially any advocating
a view that differs significantly from the consensus science, is automatically
resisted and rejected regardless of the evidence.
Now caution is a good thing but not when it crosses over into blindness in
the face of verifiable objective evidence to the contrary. This kind of resistance
leads to false assumptions that because of universal emotional acceptance
are then regarded as accurate and fact. The result is that hard to come by
money decisions in the millions and billions of dollars are made and then
spent based in part on such false presumptions that others can take advantage
of. Valuable objectivity is lost to decision making as is being in touch with
reality. Based on false assumptions, reckless and risky behavior is promoted
like bombing the bottoms of dark deep Moon craters when you have no idea what
is in the bottom of them.
A researcher like me can't help human behavior, he can only plug away with
visual evidence trying to help change behavior to better adapt to reality.
This report concentrates a few of the most obvious and unmistakable examples
representing a variety of Mars biological life (bio-life) gleaned from both
the website and the book's evidence record. Remember, each of these samples
are easily verifiable right in the official science data via the links provided
here. Remember as well that officially there isn't suppose to be even one
of this kind of bio-life evidence on Mars, must less the multiples found here
and at the website and in the book.
Remember, I did not make any of this evidence or change it in any way. This
visual evidence is fact and a part of the official science record and supported
by that record. If you can look at these selected examples and believe via
your conditioning that you are looking at Mars natural geological terrain
rather than biological life, then I can do nothing for you.
Two verification links below for above images
#1 and #2
http://www.msss.com/moc_gallery/m07_m12/images/M08/M0804110.html
http://ida.wr.usgs.gov/html/m08041/m0804110.html
Below Report #21 website link & on book
page 153
/evidence-reports/2001/021/21-m0804110-report.htm
In the above 1st and 2nd images,
drawn from the M08-04110 strip already previously
posted as website evidence in Report #21, we're looking at the top of highlands
snow covered ridges that have a steep slope down on either the left or right
side. The bio-life is the darker sunlight absorbing evidence on top of the
ridges. It comes in two visual forms. The bio-life evidence in #1 is the soft
fluffy open kind while the evidence in #2 is the tightly packed very dense
kind even though both I'm satisfied are the same species.
I suspect that this particular bio-life has specially adapted to these highland
steep ridge tops where the slope incline is less severe giving them the opportunity
to establish themselves. I suspect that rising incoming air currents dump
moisture either as snow on top of the image #2 very dense bio-life where it
melts down into it or as condensate ice moisture collecting on darker branches
of the more open soft fluffy kind in image #1 that absorbs sunlight warmth
later on in the morning forming melt.
I suspect that what you see in the above image #1 is the more open form that
processes condensate moisture on branching's within its body that rising air
passes through while the denser more tightly packed kind in image #2 presents
an upper level surface designed to catch falling snow for later melt. In other
words, although the evidence in #1 and #2 may look different from each other,
it is actually the same highly adaptable evidence functioning differently
taking advantage of differing conditions.
Two verification links below for above images
#3 and #4
http://www.msss.com/moc_gallery/s05_s10/images/S08/S0800425.html
http://ida.wr.usgs.gov/html/s08004/s0800425.html
Book page 187
The above 3rd and 4th images are
of two different areas of the same S08-00425 strip
reported as book evidence and not posted here at the website previously. I've
added some color for viewing comfort and the view is inclusive from one side
edge of the strip to the other. Note how much courser the texture is in the
3rd image as compared to the 4th image evidence texture even though they are
the same forest evidence. Do you see anything in these two images that looks
like natural geological terrain? Oh yes the terrain is there but it is visually
buried out of sight under this densely packed coverage of unmistakable bio-life.
As you can see, this bio-life evidence densely packed coverage is complete
from one edge of the strip to another. This is typical of these MGS MOC narrow-angle
strips as they take small visual slices out of vast fields bio-life. Rarely
do these strips catch the visual edge of a field of bio-life. Further, if
they did, that would probably be eliminated by the secrecy manipulations because
it is much easier to recognize bio-life when one can see its edge transition
into real raw geological terrain.
It's like taking a picture of the center area of a room of carpet. The continuous
field of fibers all visually mix and run together making it difficult to identify
exactly what one is looking at if that is all one sees. On the other hand,
if the picture is of the edge of the carpet where the fibers can be seen from
a slight side angle to be standing upright, it is then much easier to make
an identification.
So the center area shots like the above 3rd and 4th images are left alone
no doubt because they probably know from experience that the above is not
readily identifiable by the average person without a certain amount of doubt
due to past conditioning. As far as I'm concerned, the above evidence speaks
for itself. The question is can you confuse the above 3rd and 4th images with
geological terrain? If you can, then there is nothing more I can say.
Two verification links below for above images
#5 and #6
http://www.msss.com/moc_gallery/e07_e12/images/E08/E0801053.html
http://ida.wr.usgs.gov/html/e08010/e0801053.html
BOOK page 207
The above 5th image at 100% and
the 6th at 200% from the E08-01053 strip are
from a site nearby the evidence in the 3rd and 4th images but here showing
a larger more pronounced size of the same bio-life forest species. Again,
this evidence is from the book and has not been posted at the website before.
Also, again the evidence is from one side edge of the strip to the other with
color added for comfort and a closer look provided.
Note that in both the 100% and 200% zoom view, I've pointed out single fairly
clearly seen individual plant with yellow arrow and labeling. Neither the
massive evidence or the single plant should exist according to official consensus
science. What do you think?
Two verification links below for above images
#7 and #8
http://www.msss.com/moc_gallery/s05_s10/images/S07/S0702623.html
http://ida.wr.usgs.gov/html/s07026/s0702623.html
BOOK page 231
The above 7th image at 100% and 8th image at 200% from the S07-02623 strip demonstrate a different looking bio-life. However, note that once again it is super densely packed and represent a view from one side edge to the strip to the other. The coverage for sunlight space is so complete that it blocks out any view of the underlying natural geological terrain. This is so typical of Mars bio-life in the MGS MOC imaging. In my opinion, the above 8th image speaks for itself as to bio-life evidence.
Two verification links below for the above image
#9
http://www.msss.com/moc_gallery/m07_m12/images/M07/M0703768.html
http://ida.wr.usgs.gov/html/m07037/m0703768.html
Below Report #108 website link & on
book page 175
/evidence-reports/2006/108/networking-lines.htm
Not to the left out, the above
9th image from the M07-03768 strip demonstrates
an old growth densely packed forest tree canopy. This has been previously
posted at the website. As you can see and as demonstrated in the other image
evidence here, this represents very old growth where every bit of sunlight
space has been filled over time and no natural ground geology is visible at
all either in this image or in the entire strip.
This kind of massive old growth forest complete coverage of essentially the
same species tree bio-life does not happen over night. First every bit of
sunlight space is filled and then certain species compete for domination eventually
replacing less aggressive species until the forest being imaged is essentially
occupied by the same more aggressive species and its variations. The point
being that old growth forests like these represent a lot of time likely measured
in many hundreds of years to establish themselves in this way driving out
less aggressive differing competition species.
This suggests that, not only do favorable environments for forest proliferation
exist on Mars, the favorable environments these forests flourish in are very
stable over very long periods of time. How does that compare with the mainstream
consensus that Mars has a 95+% CO2 atmosphere lethal
to life as we know it by many times over and as cold at –180º to
–220º F right where this evidence exists, which is cold enough
to bust steel, not to mention the extreme pressures. Unless careful selection
of the images we do see is going on by secrecy, it also suggests that anyone
living on Mars does not regard these forest products as a commercial resource
since harvesting does not appear to happen.
Denying the presence of bio-life evidence by saying it can't exist because
it is impossible just doesn't cut it. So, assuming this verifiable visual
evidence exists via its verifiable presence here, then something is seriously
wrong with the consensus science so universally accepted that Mars is a hostile
environment to humans and life as we know it. Obviously, the evidence presented
here tells a completely different story. In fact, not just different but diametrically
opposed and the opposite of the consensus opinion. In other words, the presence
of this kind of evidenced tells us that we've apparently been scammed by those
that we trust and/or they are just incompetent.
Frankly, I to am growing weary of this kind of verifiable forest bio-life
evidence just being ignored as though it doesn't exist by the mainstream science,
media and public. It just can't be disposed of by labeling it an aberration
when too many examples exist as they do here at the website and in the book.
A picture rarely lies and, if it does, it must be made to do so by intervention
in it by some other party. The image evidence of surface water in a liquid
state in Report #199 and bio-life in this report is telling us that the planet
Mars has an atmosphere much more favorable to life as we know it than we have
been led to believe. Further, it also tells us that the Mars environment may
well be much more stable over long periods of time than we might expect of
a planet with a thinner atmosphere than Earth's.
Come on folks, as you can see, this objective hard visual evidence of surface
water and bio-life forests simply exists and therefore just can't be ignored
or denied. The secrecy we're the target of relating to this corrupts those
doing it, it fosters lies, deceit and poor decision making involving immense
amounts of our money, and it corrupts creating a form of tyranny and ignorance
in populations that starts being accepted as a norm and goes unquestioned.
This must be rectified. The only way that is going to happen is by bringing
this to the attention of more and more of the mainstream public that may eventually
get fed up enough to demand full disclosure. That can only happen via use
of the mainstream media pathways they frequent to reach them. Here's my appeal
to you. Contact the media via email and insist that
they bring this situation to the attention of their audience. Make it easy
for them by providing them with active links to this Report
200 on the bio-life evidence and previous Report
199 on the surface water evidence.
Remember, those human movements in north Africa and the mid-east talked and
networked online until finally after a certain point only action would do
and look what they are accomplishing against all the odds on their own and
even at very serious personal risk. It's a truth, freedom is not free and
must be earned! The false information hiding truth in the official science
data is itself a form of tyranny where brazen deceit and external imposed
ignorance and scamming money becomes an accepted norm. Is that who we are,
the people who dropped the ball? We want your money but not your participation
or sharing any truth with you!
Just how poor do we need to be treated by secrecy elitists before enough is
enough for you? Aren't we at least as good as those fighting so energetically
for a taste of freedom and democracy in north Africa and the mid-east? After
all, we number in the millions according to the traffic to this website evidence
and life risk is not a factor for us. Yes we'd have to go to some effort and
yes the cost can be high in some says but what appeared at first to be immoveable
mountains can be moved by only rank know very little amateurs as these people
in north Africa and the mid-east have demonstrated only too clearly.
Unlike in the movie Red October, no one is going to tremble at our silence.
If we regard this as an issue of importance, then we are going to have to
take the bull by the horns and make noise on our own behalf earning our way.
Remember, I suspect others are watching to see if we will actually do something
to help ourselves. Dropping the ball is not only self destructive, it is not
a viable option for those that have something to accomplish.
, Investigator
